81219295-Central Project Evaluations: Fragile contexts, framework agreement 6 of 12

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

We plan to award framework agreements covering a 2-year period for mid-term and final central project evaluations. The objective is to establish a pool of contractors whereas the number of contractors is not limited.
This invitation to tender is one of 12 contract award procedures (framework agreements) covering different thematic areas. A separate pool of contractors will be established for each contract award procedure. Bidders may be freelance/self-employed persons or consulting firms.
At the time of this invitation to tender, the precise dates/time of each evaluation have not been specified. Additional evaluations may also be possible.

Deadline

Die Frist für den Eingang der Angebote war 2017-12-22. Die Ausschreibung wurde veröffentlicht am 2017-11-17.

Anbieter

Die folgenden Lieferanten werden in Vergabeentscheidungen oder anderen Beschaffungsunterlagen erwähnt:

• Adelphi Consult GmbH
• Annette Englert
• GOPA - gesellschaft für Organisation, Planung und Ausbildung mbH
• GOPA Gesellschaft für Organisation, Planung und Ausbildung mbH
• Madiba Consult GmbH
• Mainlevel Consulting AG
• Manuela Leonhardt

Wer?

• Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH

Wie?

• Unternehmens- und Managementberatung › Beratung in Sachen Evaluierung

Wo?

• Darmstadt › Main-Taunus-Kreis

Geschichte der Beschaffung

Datum	Dokument
2017-11-17	Auftragsbekanntmachung
2018-12-03	Bekanntmachung über vergebene Aufträge

Auftragsbekanntmachung (2017-11-17)
Objekt
Umfang der Beschaffung
Titel: Beratung in Sachen Evaluierung
Referenznummer: 81219295
Kurze Beschreibung:

We plan to award framework agreements covering a 2-year period for mid-term and final central project evaluations. The objective is to establish a pool of contractors whereas the number of contractors is not limited. This invitation to tender is one of 12 contract award procedures (framework agreements) covering different thematic areas. A separate pool of contractors will be established for each contract award procedure. Bidders may be freelance/self-employed persons or consulting firms. At the time of this invitation to tender, the precise dates/time of each evaluation have not been specified. Additional evaluations may also be possible.

Metadaten der Bekanntmachung
Originalsprache: Englisch 🗣️
Dokumenttyp: Auftragsbekanntmachung
Art des Auftrags: Dienstleistungen
Verordnung: Europäische Union, mit GPA-Beteiligung
Gemeinsames Vokabular für öffentliche Aufträge (CPV)
Code: Beratung in Sachen Evaluierung 📦

Verfahren
Verfahrensart: Offenes Verfahren
Angebotsart: Angebot für alle Lose
Vergabekriterien
Wirtschaftlichstes Angebot

Öffentlicher Auftraggeber
Identität
Land: Deutschland 🇩🇪
Art des öffentlichen Auftraggebers: Einrichtung des öffentlichen Rechts
Name des öffentlichen Auftraggebers: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
Postanschrift: Dag-Hammarskjöld-Weg 1-5
Postleitzahl: 65760
Postort: Eschborn
Kontakt
Internetadresse: http://www.giz.de 🌏
E-Mail: stefan.mironjuk@giz.de 📧
URL der Dokumente: https://www.giz.de/biddingopportunities-services 🌏

Referenz
Daten
Absendedatum: 2017-11-17 📅
Einreichungsfrist: 2017-12-22 📅
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2017-11-21 📅
Datum des Beginns: 2018-05-15 📅
Datum des Endes: 2020-05-31 📅
Kennungen
Bekanntmachungsnummer: 2017/S 223-463876
ABl. S-Ausgabe: 223

Objekt
Umfang der Beschaffung
Kurze Beschreibung:

This invitation to tender is one of 12 contract award procedures (framework agreements) covering different thematic areas. A separate pool of contractors will be established for each contract award procedure. Bidders may be freelance/self-employed persons or consulting firms.

At the time of this invitation to tender, the precise dates/time of each evaluation have not been specified. Additional evaluations may also be possible.

Central project evaluations generally concern projects that GIZ carries out on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) as our main commissioning party, together with our partners in order to support their change projects.

The current evaluation portfolio covers the following thematic areas worldwide:

Framework agreement title

Reference No / Transaction No

1. Economic policy, pro-poor growth strategies 81219290

2. Private sector development, SME and MSME promotion

81219291

3. Health

81219292

4. Legal and judicial systems, human rights, civil society 81219293

5. Urban and regional development

81219294

6. Fragile contexts

81219295

7. Refugee movements and migration

81219296

8. Climate

81219297

9. Biodiversity

81219298

10. Agriculture, rural development and climate change

81219299

11. Water and sanitation

81219300

12. Energy

81219301

The subjects of the evaluations in this framework agreement are technical cooperation projects in the field of fragile contexts.

The purpose of a central project evaluation is to provide a critical, analytical review of the results and implementation of a project. They can be carried out at different times: completed projects are evaluated some 8 months after the end of their term, which is usually 3 years (final evaluation). Projects with planned follow-on measures are also evaluated during their term (mid-term evaluation), depending on the intended use (submission for planning the follow-on commission, project steering, reporting to the commissioning party, strategic reflection). Both the mid-term and final evaluations take predecessor projects into consideration (where substantively relevant) in order to make statements about long-term results and sustainability. Contractors must prepare a final project evaluation report.

The different types of evaluation are designed to provide a robust insight into the outputs, outcomes and impacts of approaches in partner structures. To ensure the comparability of project evaluations in German development cooperation and at the international level, GIZ applies the 5 evaluation criteria agreed by the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Relevance, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Impact and Sustainability. The particular challenge lies in verifying a causal relationship between measures and results up to impacts, and in plausibly substantiating the contribution of those measures to the results. To address the challenge of verifying a causal relationship, a theoretically sound, transparent and robust methodological approach is required. All evaluations must be carried out by a team consisting of one international and one local/regional evaluator.

Central project evaluations of GIZ projects are carried out using a system of rotation. In early 2018, a sample of the same size will be drawn, and invitations to tender will be issued EU-wide for corresponding evaluations in the following years.

Ort der Leistung
Hauptstandort oder Erfüllungsort: Global.

Verfahren
Zeitpunkt des Eingangs der Angebote: 23:59
Sprachen, in denen Angebote oder Teilnahmeanträge eingereicht werden können: Deutsch 🗣️
Englisch 🗣️
Gültigkeitsdauer des Angebots: 2018-05-15 📅
Datum der Angebotseröffnung: 2017-12-27 📅
Zeitpunkt der Angebotseröffnung: 12:00

Öffentlicher Auftraggeber
Kontakt
Internetadresse: www.giz.de 🌏
Dokumente URL: https://www.giz.de/biddingopportunities-services 🌏
Kontaktperson: Angebotseröffnung E230
E-Mail: vel@giz.de 📧
Land: Main-Taunus-Kreis 🏙️

Ergänzende Informationen
Körper überprüfen
Name: Vergabekammer des Bundes beim Bundeskartellamt
Postanschrift: Villemobler Straße 76
Postort: Bonn
Postleitzahl: 53123
Land: Deutschland 🇩🇪
Telefon: +49 2289499-0 📞
Fax: +49 2289499-163 📠
Internetadresse: http://www.bundeskartellamt.de 🌏
Informationen zu Fristen für Nachprüfungsverfahren:

According to Article 160, Section 3 of the German Act Against Restraint of Competition, application for re-examination is not permissible insofar as:

1. the applicant has identified the claimed infringement of the contract award regulations before submitting the application for re-examination and has not submitted a complaint to the commissioning party within a period of 10 calendar days; the expiry of the period pursuant to Article 134, Section 2 remains unaffected,

2. complaints of infringements of contract award regulations that are evident in the notice are not submitted to the commissioning party at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for the application specified in the notice or by the deadline for the submission of bids,

3. complaints of infringements of contract award regulations that first become evident in the tender documents are not submitted to the commissioning party at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for application or for the submission of bids,

4. more than 15 calendar days have elapsed after receipt of the notification from the commissioning party that it is unwilling to redress the complaint.

Sentence 1 does not apply in the case of an application to determine the invalidity of the contract in accordance with Article 135, Section 1 (2). Article 134, Section 1, Sentence 2 remains unaffected.

Quelle: OJS 2017/S 223-463876 (2017-11-17)

Bekanntmachung über vergebene Aufträge (2018-12-03)
Objekt
Umfang der Beschaffung
Kurze Beschreibung:

Framework Agreements covering a 2-year period for mid-term and final central project evaluations. The objective is to establish a pool of contractors whereas the number of contractors is not limited. This Invitation to Tender is 1 of 12 contract award procedures (Framework Agreements) covering different thematic areas. A separate pool of contractors will be established for each contract award procedure. Bidders may be freelance/self-employed persons or consulting firms. At the time of this invitation to tender, the precise dates/time of each evaluation have not been specified. Additional evaluations may also be possible.

Gesamtwert des Auftrags: 420 000 EUR 💰
Metadaten der Bekanntmachung
Dokumenttyp: Bekanntmachung über vergebene Aufträge

Verfahren
Angebotsart: Entfällt

Referenz
Daten
Absendedatum: 2018-12-03 📅
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 2018-12-05 📅
Kennungen
Bekanntmachungsnummer: 2018/S 234-535417
Verweist auf Bekanntmachung: 2017/S 223-463876
ABl. S-Ausgabe: 234
Zusätzliche Informationen

According to Article 160, Section 3 of the German Act Against Restraint of Competition, application for re-examination is not permissible insofar as: 1) The applicant has identified the claimed infringement of the contract award regulations before submitting the application for re-examination and has not submitted a complaint to the commissioning party within a period of 10 calendar days; the expiry of the period pursuant to Article 134, Section 2 remains unaffected; 2) Complaints of infringements of contract award regulations that are evident in the notice are not submitted to the commissioning party at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for the application specified in the notice or by the deadline for the submission of bids; 3) Complaints of infringements of contract award regulations that first become evident in the tender documents are not submitted to the commissioning party at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for application or for the submission of bids; 4) More than 15 calendar days have elapsed after receipt of the notification from the commissioning party that it is unwilling to redress the complaint. Sentence 1 does not apply in the case of an application to determine the invalidity of the contract in accordance with Article 135, Section 1 (2). Article 134, Section 1, Sentence 2 remains unaffected.

Objekt
Umfang der Beschaffung
Kurze Beschreibung:

Framework Agreements covering a 2-year period for mid-term and final central project evaluations. The objective is to establish a pool of contractors whereas the number of contractors is not limited.

This Invitation to Tender is 1 of 12 contract award procedures (Framework Agreements) covering different thematic areas. A separate pool of contractors will be established for each contract award procedure. Bidders may be freelance/self-employed persons or consulting firms.

At the time of this invitation to tender, the precise dates/time of each evaluation have not been specified.

Additional evaluations may also be possible.

1) Economic policy, pro-poor growth strategies 81219290;

2) Private sector development, SME and MSME promotion 81219291;

3) Health 81219292;

4) Legal and judicial systems, human rights, civil society 81219293;

5) Urban and regional development 81219294;

6) Fragile contexts 81219295;

7) Refugee movements and migration 81219296;

8) Climate 81219297;

9) Biodiversity 81219298;

10) Agriculture, rural development and climate change 81219299;

11) Water and sanitation 81219300;

12) Energy 81219301.

The subjects of the evaluations in this Framework Agreement are technical cooperation projects in the field of agriculture, rural development and climate change.

The purpose of a central project evaluation is to provide a critical, analytical review of the results and implementation of a project. They can be carried out at different times: completed projects are evaluated some 8 months after the end of their term, which is usually 3 years (final evaluation). Projects with planned follow-on measures are also evaluated during their term (mid-term evaluation), depending on the intended use (submission for planning the follow-on commission, project steering, reporting to the commissioning party,strategic reflection). Both the mid-term and final evaluations take predecessor projects into consideration (where substantively relevant) in order to make statements about long-term results and sustainability. Contractors must prepare a final project evaluation report.

The different types of evaluation are designed to provide a robust insight into the outputs, outcomes and impacts of approaches in partner structures. To ensure the comparability of project evaluations in German development cooperation and at the international level, GIZ applies the 5 evaluation criteria agreed by the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD): Relevance, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Impact and Sustainability. The particular challenge lies in verifying a causal relationship between measures and results up to impacts, and in plausibly substantiating the contribution of those measures to the results. To address the challenge of verifying a causal relationship, a theoretically sound, transparent and robust methodological approach is required. All evaluations must be carried out by a team consisting of one international and one local/regional evaluator.

Verfahren
Vergabekriterien
Qualitätskriterium (Bezeichnung): Technical evaluation
Qualitätskriterium (Gewichtung): 70 %
Preis (Gewichtung): 30 %

Auftragsvergabe
Datum des Vertragsabschlusses: 2018-05-24 📅
Name: Manuela Leonhardt
Postort: Eschborn
Land: Deutschland 🇩🇪
Darmstadt 🏙️
Gesamtwert des Auftrags: 60 000 EUR 💰
Datum des Vertragsabschlusses: 2018-06-01 📅
Name: Annette Englert
Postort: Münster
Land: Münster 🏙️
Datum des Vertragsabschlusses: 2018-05-28 📅
Name: Adelphi Consult GmbH
Postort: Berlin
Land: Berlin 🏙️
Datum des Vertragsabschlusses: 2018-05-22 📅
Name: GOPA - Gesellschaft für Organisation, Planung und Ausbildung mbH
Postort: Bad Homburg
Name: Mainlevel Consulting AG
Madiba Consult GmbH
Postort: Bonn
Land: Bonn, Kreisfreie Stadt 🏙️
Name: GOPA Gesellschaft für Organisation, Planung und Ausbildung mbH
Informationen über Ausschreibungen
Anzahl der eingegangenen Angebote: 16

Referenz
Zusätzliche Informationen

According to Article 160, Section 3 of the German Act Against Restraint of Competition, application for re-examination is not permissible insofar as:

1) The applicant has identified the claimed infringement of the contract award regulations before submitting the application for re-examination and has not submitted a complaint to the commissioning party within a period of 10 calendar days; the expiry of the period pursuant to Article 134, Section 2 remains unaffected;

2) Complaints of infringements of contract award regulations that are evident in the notice are not submitted to the commissioning party at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for the application specified in the notice or by the deadline for the submission of bids;

3) Complaints of infringements of contract award regulations that first become evident in the tender documents are not submitted to the commissioning party at the latest by the expiry of the deadline for application or for the submission of bids;

4) More than 15 calendar days have elapsed after receipt of the notification from the commissioning party that it is unwilling to redress the complaint.

Quelle: OJS 2018/S 234-535417 (2018-12-03)

Neue Beschaffungen in verwandten Kategorien 🆕

Dienstleistungen für Unternehmen: Recht, Marketing, Consulting, Einstellungen, Druck und Sicherheit (>20 neue Beschaffungen)

Unternehmens- und Managementberatung und zugehörige Dienste (>20)

Unternehmens- und Managementberatung (>20)

Allgemeine Managementberatung (4)
Beratung im Bereich Finanzverwaltung
Beratung im Bereich Personalverwaltung (3)
Beratung in der Produktionsleitung (1)
Beratung in Sachen Evaluierung (4)
Beschaffungsberatung (2)
Marketing-Beratung (4)
Sicherheitsberatung (1)
Öffentlichkeitsarbeit (3)